

Physics at the LHC and a future e^+ e^- Linear Collider
will be complementary in many respects, similarly to the
situation at previous generations of hadron and lepton
colliders. While qualitatively this is obvious, a more
quantitative account of the mutual benefits of the physics
program at both machines requires detailed studies. For
this purpose the LHC / LC Study Group has formed as a
world-wide working group. It investigates the possible
interplay between LHC and LC and studies in particular the
synergy effects arising from concurrent running of the two
machines. The main results obtained within the LHC / LC
Study Group so far are briefly summarized.
[D4.002] US LHC Accelerator Ramp;D Program
James Strait (Fermilab)
The United States National Laboratories are currently
building advanced accelerator equipment and providing
technical support for the construction of the Large Hadron
Collider at CERN. This work included state of the art
superconducting quadrupoles, beam separation dipoles,
cryogenic feedboxes, and specialized absorbers for the
interaction regions; testing and other support for the
production of superconducting cable for the main LHC
magnets; and accelerator physics studies. This collaboration
will be extended beyond the construction phase, to address
machine commissioning, funamental accelerator physics using
the LHC, and Ramp;D on advanced accelerator instrumentation and
beyond the state of the art superconducting magnets for
future upgrades to the LHC. In this talk I will summarize
the status of the U.S. effort on the construction of LHC,
and describe the future Ramp;D plans.
[D4.003] RF Technology for a Linear Collider
Chris Adolphsen (Stanford Linear Accelerator Center)
This year the ICFA-sponsored International Technology
Recommendation Panel will down-select an rf technology to be
used for the main linacs in a next generation linear
collider. A choice will be made between the cold
technology of the TESLA proposal, which employs
superconducting, L-Band (1.3 GHz) accelerator cavities, and
the warm technology of the NLC and GLC proposals, which
employ room temperature, X-band (11.4 GHz) accelerator
structures. The choice of a warm or cold approach has major
implications not only for the rf systems, but for the
challenges faced in generating and preserving the small beam
emittances that are required. This paper will focus on the
rf systems, in particular, a review will be given of the
designs, the Ramp;D programs and the risks associated with
achieving the beam energy goals in each case.
[D4.004] The US LC Technology Comparison Study
Gerald Dugan (Laboratory for Elementary Particle Physics, Cornell University)
At the request of the United States Linear Collider Steering
Group (USLCSG), a study has been carried out to evaluate two
options for a high-energy electron-positron linear collider
sited in the United States. One option is based on
normal-conducting X-band rf technology, similar to the
design of the GLC/NLC Collaboration. The other option is
based on superconducting L-band rf technology, similar to
the design of the TESLA Collaboration. The reference designs
for both options satisfy the physics-based machine
requirements specified by the Physics/Detector Subcommittee
of the USLCSG. Both options were developed in concert,
using, as much as possible, similar approaches in technical
design for similar accelerator systems, and a common
approach to cost and schedule estimation, reliability design
and evaluation, and project risk assessments. This talk will
present the results of the study.
[D4.005] Large Extra Dimensions
Nima Arkani-Hamed (Harvard University)
This abstract not available.