Previous session | Next session

Session C1 - EPR to Entanglement.
INVITED session, Saturday morning, April 20
Kiva Auditorium, Albuquerque Convention Center

[C1.001] EPR: Some History and Clarification

Arthur Fine (University of Washington)

Locality, separation and entanglement – 1930s style. We’ll explore the background to the 1935 paper by Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen, how it was composed, the actual argument of the paper, the principles used, and how the paper was received by Schroedinger, and others.We’ll also look at Bohr’s response: the extent to which Bohr connects with what Einstein was after in EPR and the extent to EPR marks a shift in Bohr’s thinking about the quantum theory.

[C1.002] Interpretations of Entanglement

Martin Jones (Philosophy Department, Oberlin College)

The peculiar statistical correlations between spatially separated systems which arise in quantum mechanics, and which the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paper of 1935 thrust into the limelight, have been the focus of much interpretive speculation and disagreement in the years since then. Amongst the questions raised along the way have been questions about the possibility of superluminal causation, the limits of quantum mechanics and its relation to relativity theory, the nature of and need for causal explanation, realism, determinism, and the presence of holism in quantum mechanics. This talk will provide an historically structured overview of these debates – including discussion of the Bohm theory, the many worlds interpretation, and more recent developments – and will suggest a way of dividing many of the interpretations of entanglement into clusters of like-minded views.

[C1.003] Experimental tests of Bell's inequalities: the Orsay's 1982 experiments

Alain Aspect (Institut d'Optique, ORSAY, France)

After the pioneering work of Clauser and Freedman in the early 70's, and Fry in the mid 70's, we have developped in Orsay a very efficient source of pairs of correlated photons to investigate - by testing Bell's inequalities - entanglement in the Einstein Podolsky Rosen situation. This source allowed us to carry out several experiments of 3rd generation, with new schemes close to the ideal Gedanken Experiment scheme.

In this presentation, I will first recall what is Bell's theorem, and why it is such an important milestone in the understanding of Quantum Mechanics. I will then present the new schemes that we have been able to implement in 1982, which were very close to the ideal scheme discussed by John Bell. I will finally rapidly review the recent experiments which take advantage of the progress of quantum optics in the last decades.

[C1.004] Quantum Entanglement and Information

Anton Zeilinger (Institut fuer Experimentalphysik, University of Vienna, Austria)

The development of quantum entanglement presents a very interesting and typical case how fundamental reasearch leads to new technologically interesting concepts. Initially it was introduced by Einstein and Schroedinger because of its philosophical interest. This, together with Bell's theorem, led to experiments beginning in the early 1970-s which also were only motivated by their importance for the foundations of physics. Most remarkably, in recent years people discovered that quantum entanglement can be useful in completely novel ways of transmitting and processing of information with no analog in classical physics. Here the most developed areas are quantum communication, quantum cryptography, quantum teleportation and quantum computation. In the talk I will present the basics of these applications of entanglement and I will discuss some existing experimental realisations. Finally I will argue that, while it is impossible to foresee where the present development will lead us, it is very likely that in the end a novel kind of information technology will emerge.

[C1.005] Commentary

Guido Bacciagaluppi (University of California)

This abstract not available.

Part C of program listing